New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post Reply
User avatar
RandyW
Site Admin
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:47 pm

New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post by RandyW »

[EDIT] I am periodically performing updates / maintenance on this system. If it isn't connecting, it should be back soon [/EDIT]


I have a new browser based client online for beta testing, and I am soliciting more feedback. Send your comments to: rmnoise@ournetplace.com (If you find an issue, consider documenting it with a screenshot.)

To run the new client:
a) In a browser, go to my new site here: https://rmnoise.com/
b) Click on "Web Client"
c) The first time, you will need to login. Afterwards, go right back to the above link and choose "Web Client" again.

Notes:
  • You must already have a RM Noise username and password that was created before [edit] 1-4-2026 [/edit]
  • Firefox and Chrome/Chromium have been reported to work on Windows 10/11 and Linux, but I do not know about Safari
  • Right now, only 1 server is available, and it is in Texas
  • The input device needs to support mono + 48kHz sampling
  • You can see stats and logging on the browser's console (F12 on both Chrome and Firefox -> console)
  • There is a lowpass filter mismatch between this client and the existing AI model. This *might* cause suboptimal filtering performance (I will need to retrain the AI filter, once I settle on the exact lowpass filter I want to use)
  • Be aware of the "audio buffer" under options. Buffering is automatic, but if "late audio" is counting, raise "audio buffer" to compensate for the jitter (extra buffering comes at the possible expense of extra delay behind the radio's live audio)
  • You can make recordings - they work, but they do not go to the online page yet
  • I'm aware of a few cosmetic issues with the user interface
  • You can click on the graph to replay audio from the click point (time-shift)
Randy Williams K5RMN
User avatar
HB9VQQ
Site Admin
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2023 11:18 am
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post by HB9VQQ »

Works great on Windows 10, tested with Chrome, Edge, and Firefox. Trying Linux now.

73
Roland
User avatar
HB9VQQ
Site Admin
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2023 11:18 am
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post by HB9VQQ »

I have also tested it on Ubuntu with Chromium and Firefox, all working ok. I am piping the Audio from a web-based SDR to RMN web client (in another browser tab) with the help of PulseAudio.

RMN_linux.PNG
RMN_linux.PNG (454.23 KiB) Viewed 86748 times
Roland
User avatar
HB9VQQ
Site Admin
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2023 11:18 am
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post by HB9VQQ »

Short Demo RM Noise web-client on Ubuntu




Roland
bagmouse7
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 2:52 am

Re: New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post by bagmouse7 »

Wow, the web client is fantastic!
I am sending audio from SDR Console.
Working great!
rm-noise-web.jpg
rm-noise-web.jpg (246 KiB) Viewed 81918 times
HB9DUT
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2025 4:13 pm

Re: New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post by HB9DUT »

I stumbled across the web client by chance. I've been waiting for this for a long time :D
Thank you very much!

It runs perfectly with the following configuration:
- Fedora 43 with Null Sink Pulsaudio module.
- ExpertSDR3 as audio source.
- RM Noise as PWA on Chromium Version 143.0.7499.146.
ExpertSDR3_with_RM_Noise.png
ExpertSDR3_with_RM_Noise.png (334.95 KiB) Viewed 1884 times
User avatar
RandyW
Site Admin
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:47 pm

Re: New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post by RandyW »

Thank you for your input..!

I want to provide an update on the web client and how it relates to the user recordings.

The architecture of the web client is different than the windows client, and as a consequences, the neural network and training needs to be modified to match. I'm currently using all of my GPU resources to search for the best network and training parameters, but this search takes a long time. During this time, it is impossible for me to train the existing AI filter with new user recordings, but once the search has finished, I will go through the user recordings and train the production web AI filter.

It is hard to provide a timeline, but when the production web AI filter is [finally] available, I will retrofit each of the geographically diverse servers to also support the new web client.

To illustrate, each line represents an experiment that took between 1 and 2 days...
Attachments
loss1.jpg
loss1.jpg (369.48 KiB) Viewed 1872 times
Randy Williams K5RMN
py5cl_carlos
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2024 9:49 pm

Re: New web based RM Noise client - testers wanted

Post by py5cl_carlos »

Works perfectly on Windows 11 and Brave Browser
Post Reply